More Alike than Different
Russell E. Vance, III, PhD
If this were a video or television
program it would be opening with the sound of Willie Nelson singing
“On the Road Again” with a big ole Dodge Ram Hemi 4x4 pulling a
red and white vintage trailer down the road toward the distant
mountains.
Since it's not a video or television
program you'll have to use your imagination. It was that image in my
mind that actually prompted this blog. I'm sure, as I get into the
subject, you'll start to wonder about me, but that's a different
matter.
I know a young woman who suffers from
major depressive disorder. Major depressive disorder is a chemical
depression; that is, the person only feels and manifests depression
because of a chemical imbalance. They may be having the greatest day
of their life, but if their chemistry get off they may start crying.
Comorbid to this – that's medical talk for another disease or
disorder existing at the same time – is chronic pain. Chronic
pain in and of itself is quite capable of causing depression, so this
poor lady has a double whammy. Double whammy is not a medical term,
but probably best describes her situation.
This lady has a dog. The dog is more
than a pet. The dog is a companion animal. In this case the animal
actually senses changes in her body and will alert her by his
behavior before the actual manifestation in her body. His behavior
is to try to cuddle and comfort her. There is only one way this dog
can do this. For the dog to recognize a change in emotional status
the dog must share emotions. There is only one reason for the cuddling
and comforting. The dog has and shares emotions.
This is all precursory to my thesis; a
reality of which scientist have been aware but have been afraid to
admit for at least one to two centuries; viz. that all animals share
the same emotions. Oh, my. There I went and said it. But western
religion doesn't permit its adherents to consider such a thought.
Thankfully I'm not an adherent to any religion, so I'm safe. I don't
have to worry about being punished in the United States for such
belief, at least not unless some current politicians get their way.
The eyes tell the story |
If you look closely, with an open mind,
at all mammals you will notice that we're more alike than different.
Check out our skeleton. (1) You can do an internet search and find
untold numbers of sites that compare mammal skeletons. One thing
which you will learn is that there is minimal difference. I could
give a lecture on the skeleton of a dog and you would not know I was
talking about a dog unless I told you. The biggest differences are
between gender not species. Religion wants us to think that we were
"created" differently. That's just not true. The basic
skeletal structure developed over millions of years and was
structurally established by the time the hominina (first human and
biped ancestors) came along. Compared to most mammal species we are
the johnny-come-latelies. As a separate species, our coming so much
later than others was to our benefit.
Homo Sapiens compared to Bird Skeleton |
As Dr. Carl Safina (3) likes to point
out we are willing to accept that other animals get angry but we
don't want to allow them any other emotions. That would make them the
same as us and our Abrahemic religions won't tolerate such a thought.
But how can one argue that another animal is obviously angry but
can't be happy or loving? It doesn't make sense does it.
Some years ago I encountered a report
of a mother elephant whose baby did something that it shouldn't. (4)
As a result of straying away it did get into potentially deadly
trouble. The mother and some other females rescued the baby. Once the
baby was safe the mother was observed checking the baby for injury,
cuddling and showing love and concern followed with a definite slap
on the rump for misbehaving. This can not happen without emotions.
Dr. Safina shares an entire book of observations and science to
establish this as a fact. (5) It is only human arrogance, egged on
by religion, that would deny such observations and reports.
A good speech or an article or a
monograph should always have a point or a goal. I guess by definition
this is not a good monograph because I had no conscious goal and I
only shared these thoughts because so many people have never thought
about how much we are like the other animals with whom we share this
magnificent and fragile blue planet. Perhaps if we were more conscious of our
similarities and interdependence we might curtail some of our
destructive behaviors. Alas the one big difference between the homo
sapiens and other animals is that we are the only animal that hunts
and kills for pleasure. Perhaps if you were more conscious of how
that animal loves its young, is happy, sad or afraid and wants to
live, you might not shoot and kill it for pleasure or hang its head
on your wall as a trophy.
Life on this earth is fragile.
Scientist can identify the thin margins and combinations of factors
that permitted a spinning hunk of hot gasses and rock to develop into
a planet where carbon-based life like ours can exist. To this point humans have been far from good citizens. Now is the time for change. Let us be mindful of our great treasure and do our best to preserve it. May we be mindful of our interdependence with all life on earth and show grateful respect.
FOOT
NOTES:
(1)
http://www.earthlife.net/mammals/skeleton.html and/or
https://www.basicbiology.net/animal/mammals/skeleton/
(2)
http://www.slideshare.net/LorettaBreuning/mammalian-brain-chemistry-explains-everything
(3) Safina, Carl ( ). Beyond
Words: what animals think and feel.
(4) I read this report quite a number
of years ago and can not find a reference to cite. Guess I'll just
have to say "from memory".
(5) The difference between science and
other disciplines is that for something to be accepted by science as true, fact,
etc., it must be able to be replicated. If you can't do or
demonstrate something again and again you have no case for validity.
The presence of emotions in all animals has been demonstrated
countless times.
No comments:
Post a Comment